Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdur Rahman ibn Yusuf Mangera

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) the nominator has been blocked as a sock and was the only delete vote.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:52, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abdur Rahman ibn Yusuf Mangera

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable scholar, no in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG Numan765 (talk) 09:49, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: the nominator has been blocked as a sock. See WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikibaji/Archive#26 May 2020 -- Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 15:11, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 09:55, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 09:55, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 09:55, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable scholar per The Muslim500, a non notable one gets no entry in it. Muslim 500 profile, a review of his book is there in the 2020 edition of The Muslim500, The 500 Most Influential Muslims (PDF) (2020 ed.). Royal Islamic Strategic Studies Centre. p. 124, 235., author of a number of books. WP:NAUTHOR, 4 (d) says, "been represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums." I argue that the subject's works are permanent collections of Library of Congress, see VIAF, WorldCat which says, "15 works in 25 publications in 2 languages and 141 library holdings". Merely, a subject does not have much online coverage, does not make him non notable. The subject and his works being cited 1, 2. If time permits, I will find out out offline coverage. Thanks - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:34, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep For all the reasons pointed out by the previues user. Ibn Daud (talk) 20:55, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.